Your browser version is outdated. We recommend that you update your browser to the latest version.

Our experienced attorneys will treat each individual situation with due attention and provide you with excellent legal service. For more information about our services or to make an appointment, contact us. We are open Monday thru Friday, from 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., except all Court Holidays.

Telephone No.: (801) 266-3399

860 East 4500 South, Suite 310, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States


Email us below if you have questions.

Fields marked with * are required.

Practice Areas:

  • Appellate
  • Civil Litigation
  • Civil Rights
  • Litigation


  • Grinnell College, B.A., Philosophy and Religiion, 1965, General Dynamics Award
  • University of Texas, Austin School of Law, L.L.B (J.D.), 1968 Order of the Peregrinus


  • Texas State Bar, 1968
  • Utah State Bar, 1969
  • U.S. District Court, Western District of Texas, 1968
  • U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit, 1968
  • U.S. District Court, District of Utah, 1969
  • U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit, 1973


  • Utah State Bar, Real Property Section
  • Utah State Bar, Collections Section

Representative Appellate Cases:

  • LaMont v. Evjen, 508 P.2d 532 (1973) requiring the holder of a uniform real estate contract to give fair notice prior to a forfeiture.
  • NAACP, et al. vs. Boy Scouts of America, U.S. Dist. Ct. Utah (1974) challenging the BSA’s discriminatory requirement that Patrol leaders hold the LDS priesthood at a time when African Americans were ineligible to hold the LDS priesthood. (the doctrine has since been changed)
  • Celebrity Club v. Utah Liquor Control Commission, 657 P.2d 1293 (1983) declaring unconstitutional the statute which allowed the Commission to summarily and without cause revoke a required license and disallowed any judicial review.
  • Langston v. Mcquarrie, 741 P.2d 554 (Utah Court of Appeals 1987) requiring a refund of amounts paid in the case of rescission of a cattle allotment.
  • Hall v. Process Instrument and Control, 890 P.2d 1024 (Utah Supreme Court 1995) defining the limits of the parol evidence rule in contract interpretation.
  • Keene v. Bonser, 2005 P.3d (2005 UT App 37) reversing a trial courts determination that Defendant was a cohabitant under the spouse abuse act and giving guidance to the lower courts.